|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
First published on May 20, 2008, doi:10.1177/1065912908314199
Political Research Quarterly 2008;61:403.
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008
This version was published on June
16, 2008
Do Investors Assess the Credibility of Campaign Commitments? The Case of Mexicos 2006 Presidential Race
Allyson Lucinda Benton*
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, A.C.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: allyson.benton{at}cide.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Do investors assess the credibility of campaign rhetoric? To answer this question, I develop several alternative arguments for how investors might consider candidates policy platforms and apply them to Mexicos 2006 presidential race. Statistical analysis of polling trends and the Mexican stock market shows that rising electoral uncertainty lowered market performance, while growing support for either the left-leaning Andrés Manuel López Obrador (PRD) or the marketfriendly Felipe Calderón Hinojosa (PAN) reduced market volatility. These findings reveal that investors discounted López Obradors left-leaning rhetoric but did not ignore the effect of a tight race on the value of their assets.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|